Survey on Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse practice
Project Id | 3625 |
Project Name | Zitadelle Spandau, Germany |
Description | Spandau Castle was indirectly mentioned for the first time in 1197. The Margraves of Brandenburg had built it on the site of an old Slavic settlement at the place where the rivers Havel and Spree meet. Between 1559 and 1594 the rulers, now titled Electors, built a fortress on the site to protect the nearby residential city of Berlin. In the spring of 1813 the fortress was severely damaged during the wars against Napoleon. From 1874 to 1919 the “Reichskriegsschatz” (Imperial War Treasure) was stored in the Julius Tower. The National Socialists housed laboratories for poisonous gas in the Citadel. Since 1945 the area has been used solely for non-military purposes. For more than three decades a college for trainee builders was housed in parts of the complex. When the college moved in 1986, the site became more and more important as a cultural centre. Today, the Citadel is the Island of History, offering lots to see and experience – one of Berlin’s foremost cultural and tourist “magnets”. |
Description of the economic, social and environmental impacts of the project | The Citadel of Spandau has been chosen for the recent interventions for the renovation of the spaces, of the inner squares, of the landscape ad nature, as well as for the numerous cultural and social initiatives organised in the site, demonstrating how cultural heritage can be a pusher of local sustainable econmy. Along with this, the renovation works, especially in the last years, have been carried out with a keen perspective on sustainability in retrofitting, materials waste and reuse, as well as energy reduction waste. |
Web links | website not provided |
Country | Germany |
City size | Metropolis (between 1 and 10 million people) |
Construction period | 1-Ancient_Middle-Age |
Adaptive reuse period | <2000 |
State of conservation | Medium conservation |
Vacancy before | Temporarily used |
Vacancy after | Permanently used |
Cultural significance | National heritage|Municipal heritage|Informally recognized by the local community| |
Typologies | Military| |
Ownership before | Public |
Ownership after | Public |
Management structure | The owner is also the manager| |
Managing body | Public| |
Funding full answer | Public funding (EU)|Public funding (National)|Private donations (e.g. company, tax credit donations)| |
Barriers and bottlenecks | Economic – financial|Regulatory (e.g. heritage regulations / authorities)| |
total investment | 3.000.000 – 10.000.000 € |
Residential | no |
Cohousing | no |
Hotel accommodation | no |
BnbHostel accommodation | no |
Commercial units | yes |
Wellness centres | no |
Restaurant | yes |
Cafe | yes |
Public library | yes |
Gardens | yes |
Education | yes |
Museum exhibition | yes |
Research | no |
Cultural events | yes |
Theatre | yes |
Conferences | yes |
Social uses | yes |
Community Hubs | yes |
Incubator | no |
Cultural and Creative Industries hub | yes |
Innovative startups hub | yes |
Circular economy enterprises hub | no |
Coworking spaces | yes |
Workshop spaces | yes |
Living Lab | no |
Fab Lab | no |
Creative Hub | yes |
Artist residencies | no |
Materials bank | no |
Repair Cafe | no |
Bike sharing place | no |
Sports facilities | no |
Other uses | yes |
Home | Projects | Query | Instructions for use | Authors and Acknowledgments
Copyright. All rights reserved.